We use cookies in order to improve your experience of our website. One of the cookies we use is essential for parts of our website to work properly and has already been stored on your computer. You can delete and block cookies from our website, but parts of our site will not work. To find out more please see our privacy policy page.
Keyword Search
.

Publications and presentations

Hydroxyapatite Total Hip Replacement Study
JRI vs Osteonics
Randomised prospective clinical trial comparing fully coated and proximally coated HA uncemented hip prostheses. Recruitment began in 1996 of 250 hips. Maximum follow up is 12 years.

  • Hydroxyapatite total hip replacement; 4-5 year review of prospective randomised trials comparing partial and fully coated stems
    R Hussein, A. Smith, J Shepperd, H Apthorp, A Butler-Manuel
    European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki, June 2003

A randomised prospective controlled trial comparing cemented vs uncemented fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty AGC
Recruitment began in 1994 of 254 knees. Maximum follow up is 13 years. Link to

  • The AGC Total knee replacement – Cemented vs Cementless Hydroxyapatite fixation
    Findlay I, Bowman N, Miles K, East DJ, Apthorp HD, Butler-Manuel PA
    Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, June 2008, C Vol 90-A No. 6 – Supplement AGC total knee system.
  • Cemented versus HAC AGC total knee replacement – a comparative study.
    A Butler-Manuel, J Webber, H Apthorp.
    International Knee Symposium, Naples, June 2000
    AGC User group Paris, September 2000
    Anatomic Knee Symposium, Chamonix, April 2002
    Biomet International Knee Symposium, Marbella, June 2002
    Biomet Knee Symposium, Forest of Arden, October 2002
  • Cemented vs HAC AGC TKR. A prospective randomised controlled trial.
    Butler-Manuel A, Apthorp H, Rogers A
    European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki, June 2003
  • Cemented vs HAC AGC TKR – 5 year results
    A Butler-Manuel
    Biomet International Knee Symposium, Berlin, October 2003
  • Clinical factors in implant selection - AGC TKR
    A Butler-Manuel
    Biomet International Knee Symposium ,Rome, November 2004
  • Cemented vs Cementless HA Coated AGC TKR
    Thakral H, Apthorp HD, Butler-Manuel A
    British Association for Surgery of the Knee, Edinburgh, March 2005
  • AGC Cemented vs Cementless
    A Butler-Manuel
    Biomet International Knee Symposium ,Villars, February 2005
  • Backside Wear and Modularity – The AGC Knee
    A Butler-Manuel
    International Primary and Revision Knee Symposium, Villars, February 2005
  • The AGC total knee replacement - Cemented Vs Cementless Hydroxyapatite fixation
    Findlay IA, Miles K, East D, Apthorp HD, Bulter-Manuel PA
    European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Nice, June 2008.

A randomised prospective trial comparing methods of acetabular implant fixation in
primary total hip replacements in elderly patients
Exeter cup vs ABG II cup
Recruitment began in 2001 of 200 hips. Maximum follow up of 7 years. Link to:

  • 1– 5 year review of a prospective randomised trial hip trial
    A Butler-Manuel, HD Apthorp
    Stryker Total Hip Arthroplasty Forum, Hastings, September 2003
  • A randomised prospective trial comparing methods of acetabular implant fixation in primary total hip replacements; early results
    Bucher T, Cottam HL, Butler-Manuel A, Apthorp HD
    British Hip Society, Edinburgh, March 2006
    European Orthopaedic Research Society, Bologna, June 2006
  • A randomised controlled trail comparing methods of acetabular fixation in primary total hip replacement in elderly patients
    Findlay IA, Miles K, East D, Apthorp HD, Bulter-Manuel PA
    European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Nice, June 2008.

A randomised prospective trial comparing wear in different bearing surfaces in primary
total hip replacements (Ceramic on Ceramic vs Metal on Polyethylene Liners
Recruitment began in 2001 of 200 hips. Maximum follow up of 7 years.

  • A randomised prospective trial comparing ceramic on ceramic vs metal on polyethylene bearings in total hip replacements; early results
    Bucher T, Cottam HL, Butler-Manuel PA, Apthorp HD
    European Orthopaedic Research Society, Bologna, June 2006
    European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Florence, May 2007
  • A randomised prospective trial comparing wear in different primary bearing surfaces in primary total hip replacement
    Findlay IA, Miles K, East D, Apthorp HD, Bulter-Manuel PA
    European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Nice, June 2008.

A randomised prospective clinical evaluation of Hydroxyapatite coated vs cemented
total meniscal knee prosthesis (Oxford TMK)
Recruitment began in 2001 of 230 knees. Maximum follow up of 7.

  • Introduction of a new mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis – Minimum three year follow-up of an RCT comparing with a fixed-bearing device.
    Beard DJ, Pandit H, Price AJ, Butler-Manuel PA, Dodd CA, Murray DW, Goodfellow JW.
    Knee 2007, Dec;14(6):448-51
  • Cemented vs Uncemented Oxford TMK TKR. A prospective randomised controlled trial.
    A Butler-Manuel
    Biomet International Knee Symposium, Monte-Carlo, May 2002
  • The Oxford TMK Total Knee Arthroplasty
    A Butler-Manuel
    Anatomic Knee Symposium, Arona, October 2003
  • Mobile vs fixed bearing total knee replacements
    A Butler-Manuel
    Biomet International Knee Symposium, Copenhagen, October 2004
  • Indications, technique and complications for TMK knee replacements
    A Butler-Manuel
    Biomet International Knee Symposium, Copenhagen, October 2004
  • Total Meniscal Knee (TMK) - Clinical evaluation of cemented versus hydroxyapatite coated prostheses
    Cottam HL, Apthorp HD, Butler-Manuel PA
    European Orthopaedic Research Society, Bologna, June 2006
    European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics & Traumatology Florence, May 2007

A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing the minimally invasive surgical
approach for the oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty against the standard
medial parapatellar approach (Oxford Unicompartmental)
Recruitment began in 2003 of 102 knees. Maximum follow up of 5 years.

  • A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing the minimally invasive surgical approach for the oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty against the standard medial parapatellar approach
    A Butler-Manuel
    Biomet International Knee Symposium, Berlin, October 2003
  • A prospective randomised study comparing minimal invasive and medial parapatellar approaches for unicompartmental knee replacement
    Cottam HL, Jackson M, DJ East, K Miles, Apthorp HD, Butler-Manuel PA
    British Association for Surgery of the Knee, Slough, March 2006
    European Orthopaedic Research Society, Bologna, June 2006
    British Orthopaedic Association, Glasgow, September 2006
    European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Florence, May 2007
    30th Anniversary meeting of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement, Blenheim Palace, Oxford, November 2006

A long term survivorship study of patients undergoing minimally invasive hip surgery with accelerated discharged protocol.

Recruitment began in February 2005, 338 patients have been recruited to this long term follow up study.

Back